Studying Time: 6 minutes
In lower than 10 years, three catastrophic floods ravaged northwestern Wisconsin and adjusted the way in which individuals take into consideration water.
Probably the most extreme, in July 2016, slammed Ashland with as much as 10 inches of rain in lower than a day — a month’s price of rain fell in simply two hours. As rivers swelled to report highs, main highways broke into items, and culverts washed away. It took months for roads to reopen, with greater than $41 million in injury throughout seven counties.
The Marengo River, which winds by means of forests and farmland earlier than assembly the Unhealthy River that flows into Lake Superior, was hit exhausting throughout these historic deluges. Centuries earlier, the higher watershed would have held onto that water, however logging and agriculture left the river disconnected from its floodplain, giving the water nowhere protected to go.
Immediately, the Marengo River stands for example of a brand new type of answer. Following the report floods, state leaders invested in opening up floodplains and restoring wetlands to alleviate flooding. As the necessity to adapt to disasters grows extra pressing, the Marengo River serves for example that there’s a less expensive method to take action: utilizing wetlands.
“We will’t change the climate or the patterns … however we will higher put together ourselves,” mentioned MaryJo Gingras, Ashland County’s conservationist.
Wetlands as soon as supplied extra pure flood storage throughout Wisconsin and the Mississippi River Basin, absorbing water like sponges so it couldn’t rush additional downstream. However about half of the nation’s wetlands have been drained and crammed for agriculture and growth, they usually proceed to be destroyed, at the same time as local weather change intensifies floods.
Because the federal authorities disposes of guidelines to guard wetlands, environmental advocates need to rewrite the ecosystem’s narrative to persuade extra folks that restoration is price it.
Wetlands aren’t simply fairly locations, advocates argue, but additionally powerhouses that may save communities cash by blunting the influence of flood disasters. A 2024 Wisconsin regulation geared at stopping such disasters earlier than they occur, impressed by the wetland work within the Marengo River watershed, goes to check that principle.
“Historically, the outreach has been, ‘We need to have wetlands out right here as a result of they’re good for geese, frogs and fairly flowers,’” mentioned Tracy Hames, government director of the Wisconsin Wetlands Affiliation. “What do individuals care about right here? They care about their roads, their bridges, their culverts … how can wetlands assist that?”
Bipartisan Wisconsin invoice posed wetlands as flood answer
Northern Wisconsin isn’t the one place paying the value for floods. Between 1980 and 2025, the U.S. was struck by 45 billion-dollar flood disasters, in keeping with the Nationwide Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, with a cumulative price ticket of almost $206 billion. Many elements of the huge Mississippi River Basin obtain as much as eight inches extra rain yearly than they did 50 years in the past, in keeping with a 2022 evaluation from Local weather Central, a nonprofit group that analyzes local weather science.
Damaging floods are actually so widespread within the states that border the Mississippi River, together with Wisconsin, that the difficulty can’t be ignored, mentioned Haley Gentry, assistant director of the Tulane Institute on Water Sources Legislation and Coverage in New Orleans.
“Even for those who don’t agree with sure (rules) … we completely have to search out methods to scale back injury,” Gentry mentioned.
Former Wisconsin state Rep. Loren Oldenburg, a Republican who served a flood-prone district in southwest Wisconsin till he misplaced the seat final 12 months, was concerned about how wetlands may assist.
Oldenburg joined forces with Republican state Sen. Romaine Quinn, who represents northern Wisconsin and knew of the work within the Marengo River watershed. The lawmakers proposed a grant program for flood-stricken communities to higher perceive why and the place they flood and restore wetlands in areas that want the assistance most.
Jennifer Western Hauser, coverage liaison on the Wisconsin Wetlands Affiliation, met with Democratic and Republican lawmakers to advocate for the invoice. She emphasised issues which may get their consideration — associated to transportation, emergency providers, insurance coverage, or conservation — that wetland restoration may resolve. She mentioned she acquired quite a lot of head nods as she defined that the price of regularly fixing a washed-out culvert may vanish from storing and slowing floodwaters upstream.
“These are points that hit throughout,” she mentioned. “It’s a relatable drawback.”
The invoice handed unanimously and was signed into regulation by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers in April 2024. Evers and the Republican-controlled Legislature permitted $2 million for this system within the state’s most up-to-date price range.
Twenty-three communities utilized for the primary spherical of grant funding, which provided two varieties of grants — one to assist assess flood threat and one other grant to assist construct new wetlands to scale back that threat. Eleven communities had been funded, touching most corners of the state, in keeping with Wisconsin Emergency Administration, which administered the grants.
Brian Vigue, freshwater coverage director for Audubon Nice Lakes, mentioned this system exhibits Wisconsin residents have come a good distance in how they give thought to wetlands since 2018, when the state authorities made it simpler for builders to construct in them.
There’s an assumption that wetland restoration comes solely on the expense of traditionally profitable land makes use of like agriculture or business, making it exhausting to achieve floor, Vigue mentioned. However when skeptics perceive the potential financial advantages, it may change issues.
“Once you truly discover one thing with the return on funding and may show that it’s offering these advantages … we had been stunned at how readily individuals that you just’d assume wouldn’t embrace a extremely good, proactive wetland conservation coverage did,” he mentioned.
Non-public landowners have to see outcomes
About three-quarters of the remaining wetlands within the decrease 48 states are on privately owned land, together with areas that had been focused for restoration within the Marengo River watershed. Meaning earlier than any restoration work begins, landowners should be satisfied that the work will assist, not damage them.
For initiatives like this to work, landowner objectives are a precedence, mentioned Kyle Magyera, native authorities outreach specialist on the Wisconsin Wetlands Affiliation, as a result of “they know their property higher than anybody else.”
Farmers, for instance, may be leery that beefing up wetlands will take land out of manufacturing and damage their backside line, Magyera mentioned.
Within the Marengo watershed, Gingras labored with one landowner who had farmland that wasn’t getting used. They created 5 new wetlands throughout 10 acres which have already decreased sediment and phosphorus runoff from coming into the river. And whereas there hasn’t been a flood occasion but, Gingras expects the water flows to be slowed considerably.
This work goes past restoring wetland habitat, Magyera mentioned, it’s about reconnecting waterways. In one other mission, Magyera labored on a personal property the place floods carved a brand new channel in a ravine that funneled the water sooner downstream. The property now has log buildings that mimic beaver dams to assist gradual water down and reconnect these techniques.
Beaver-inspired buildings may restrict flooding and profit wildlife habitat, however state allowing is arduous.
Now that the primary spherical of funding has been disbursed in Wisconsin’s grant program, grantees throughout the state are beginning work on their very own variations of pure flood management, like that utilized in Marengo.
In Emilie Park, alongside the flood-prone East River in Inexperienced Bay, a mission funded by this system will create 11 acres of recent wetlands. That habitat will assist retailer water and function an eco-park the place group members can stroll by means of the wetland on boardwalks.
In rural Dane County, about 20 miles from the state capital, a stretch of Black Earth Creek can be reconnected to its floodplain, restoring 5 and a half acres of wetlands and giving the creek extra room to unfold out and scale back flood threat. The creek jumped its banks throughout a close to record-breaking 2018 rainstorm, washing out two bridges and inflicting hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in injury.
Voluntary program with financial angle may very well be of curiosity elsewhere
Nature-based options to flooding have been gaining recognition alongside the Mississippi River. Wisconsin’s program may function a “nationwide mannequin” for the way to use wetlands to advertise pure flood resilience, Quinn wrote in a 2023 newspaper editorial supporting the invoice.
Kyle Rorah, regional director of public coverage for the Nice Lakes/Atlantic area of Geese Limitless, mentioned he’s speaking in regards to the Wisconsin grant program to lawmakers in different states within the higher Midwest, and he sees extra urge for food for this mannequin than counting on the federal authorities to guard wetlands.
And Vigue has discovered that stakeholders in industries like fishing, delivery and recreation are receptive to utilizing wetlands as infrastructure.
However Gentry cautioned that voluntary restoration can solely go up to now as a result of it “nonetheless permits established order growth and different associated patterns to proceed.”
Nonetheless, because the federal authorities backs off of regulation, Gentry mentioned she expects extra emphasis on the financial worth of wetlands to drive safety.
A few of that’s already taking place. A 2024 evaluation from the Union of Involved Scientists discovered that wetlands save Wisconsin and the higher Midwest almost $23 billion a 12 months that in any other case could be spent combating flooding.
“Each degree of presidency is taking a look at methods to scale back prices so it doesn’t enhance taxes for his or her constituents,” Gingras mentioned.
John Sabo, director of the ByWater Institute at Tulane College, mentioned as wetlands show their financial worth in decreasing flood injury prices, taxpayers will see their worth.
“You must take into consideration (wetlands) as offering providers for individuals,” Sabo mentioned, “if you wish to get individuals on the opposite facet of the aisle behind the concept (of restoring them).”
And though the Wisconsin grant program is small-scale for now, he mentioned if different states bordering the Mississippi River comply with its lead, it may scale back flooding throughout the area.
“If all upstream states begin to construct upstream wetlands,” he mentioned, “that has downstream impacts.”
This story is a part of the collection Down the Drain from the Mississippi River Basin Ag & Water Desk, an impartial reporting collaborative primarily based on the College of Missouri in partnership with Report for America, with main funding from the Walton Household Basis.
Wisconsin Watch is a member of the Ag & Water Desk community. Join our newsletters to get our information straight to your inbox.
