By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
PulseReporterPulseReporter
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Investigations
Reading: Taylor Swift’s Subpoena Withdrawn In Full of life V. Baldoni
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
PulseReporterPulseReporter
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Investigations
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
PulseReporter > Blog > Entertainment > Taylor Swift’s Subpoena Withdrawn In Full of life V. Baldoni
Entertainment

Taylor Swift’s Subpoena Withdrawn In Full of life V. Baldoni

Pulse Reporter
Last updated: May 24, 2025 2:07 am
Pulse Reporter 2 months ago
Share
Taylor Swift’s Subpoena Withdrawn In Full of life V. Baldoni
SHARE


Contents
Taylor Swift’s subpoena has been withdrawn from the continued Blake Full of life and Justin Baldoni litigation.Final December, Blake sued her It Ends With Us co-star and director, alleging sexual harassment and a retaliatory smear marketing campaign. In return, he denied the allegations and sued her, claiming defamation and extortion. The case is ready to go to trial subsequent 12 months.So, why the involvement from Taylor? Justin primarily tried to argue that Blake used her friendship with the celebrity to stress him into making editorial adjustments within the film. Therefore, earlier this month, Taylor was subpoenaed as a witness.Taylor’s group instantly shut down the allegations, saying in a assertion, “Taylor Swift by no means set foot on the set of this film, she was not concerned in any casting or artistic selections, she didn’t rating the movie, she by no means noticed an edit or made any notes on the movie, she didn’t even see It Ends With Us till weeks after its public launch, and was touring across the globe throughout 2023 and 2024 headlining the largest tour in historical past.”The assertion continued, “The connection Taylor needed to this movie was allowing the usage of one track, ‘My Tears Ricochet.’ On condition that her involvement was licensing a track for the movie, which 19 different artists additionally did, this doc subpoena is designed to make use of Taylor Swift’s title to attract public curiosity by creating tabloid clickbait as an alternative of specializing in the information of the case.”Nonetheless, Taylor’s title continued to be drawn into media consideration on the case, as Justin’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, wrote a letter to the decide claiming that he’d heard that Blake’s group had tried to blackmail the singer into supporting her by threatening to launch previous textual content messages.A decide rapidly struck the letter from the document, accusing the transfer of attempting to “‘promote public scandal’ by advancing inflammatory accusations” and including, “Counsel is suggested that future misuse of the Courtroom’s docket could also be met with sanctions.”This week, Full of life’s group pushed for Justin’s group to be sanctioned, requesting “attorneys’ charges and prices” and “a proper reprimand for the submitting of baseless claims as a way of harassing Ms. Full of life and gaining favor within the courtroom of public opinion.” Justin’s group did not reply to a request for remark.Quick ahead to yesterday, and Selection reported that Taylor would now not face a courtroom summons as Justin’s group had withdrawn the subpoena. As per the publication, each Blake and Taylor’s attorneys had filed motions to beforehand dismiss the summons, which “sought communications between their respective authorized groups.”A spokesperson for Blake subsequently stated, “We’re happy that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Events have withdrawn their harassing subpoenas to Taylor Swift and her legislation agency…We supported the efforts of Taylor’s group to quash these inappropriate subpoenas directed to her counsel and we’ll proceed to face up for any third get together who’s unjustly harassed or threatened within the course of.”“The Baldoni and Wayfarer group have tried to place Taylor Swift, a lady who has been an inspiration for tens of hundreds of thousands throughout the globe, on the middle of this case since day one,” they additional alleged. “Exploiting Taylor Swift’s celeb was the unique plan in Melissa Nathan’s situation planning doc, and it continues to at the present time. Confronted with having to justify themselves in federal courtroom, they folded. In some unspecified time in the future they are going to run out of distractions from the precise claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they’re going through.”The “situation planning doc” refers back to the PR doc that Blake’s authorized grievance says was despatched to Justin, which deliberate for what would possibly occur “ought to and her group make her grievances public.” The doc reportedly stated, that it might “additionally discover planting tales concerning the weaponization of feminism and the way individuals in BL’s circle like Taylor Swift, have been accused of using these ways to ‘bully’ into getting what they need.”As of proper now, Justin’s group hasn’t issued an announcement. BuzzFeed has reached out to Bryan Freedman for remark.
Taylor Swift’s Subpoena Withdrawn In Full of life V. Baldoni

Taylor Swift’s subpoena has been withdrawn from the continued Blake Full of life and Justin Baldoni litigation.

Final December, Blake sued her It Ends With Us co-star and director, alleging sexual harassment and a retaliatory smear marketing campaign. In return, he denied the allegations and sued her, claiming defamation and extortion. The case is ready to go to trial subsequent 12 months.

So, why the involvement from Taylor? Justin primarily tried to argue that Blake used her friendship with the celebrity to stress him into making editorial adjustments within the film. Therefore, earlier this month, Taylor was subpoenaed as a witness.

Taylor’s group instantly shut down the allegations, saying in a assertion, “Taylor Swift by no means set foot on the set of this film, she was not concerned in any casting or artistic selections, she didn’t rating the movie, she by no means noticed an edit or made any notes on the movie, she didn’t even see It Ends With Us till weeks after its public launch, and was touring across the globe throughout 2023 and 2024 headlining the largest tour in historical past.”

The assertion continued, “The connection Taylor needed to this movie was allowing the usage of one track, ‘My Tears Ricochet.’ On condition that her involvement was licensing a track for the movie, which 19 different artists additionally did, this doc subpoena is designed to make use of Taylor Swift’s title to attract public curiosity by creating tabloid clickbait as an alternative of specializing in the information of the case.”

Nonetheless, Taylor’s title continued to be drawn into media consideration on the case, as Justin’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, wrote a letter to the decide claiming that he’d heard that Blake’s group had tried to blackmail the singer into supporting her by threatening to launch previous textual content messages.

A decide rapidly struck the letter from the document, accusing the transfer of attempting to “‘promote public scandal’ by advancing inflammatory accusations” and including, “Counsel is suggested that future misuse of the Courtroom’s docket could also be met with sanctions.”

This week, Full of life’s group pushed for Justin’s group to be sanctioned, requesting “attorneys’ charges and prices” and “a proper reprimand for the submitting of baseless claims as a way of harassing Ms. Full of life and gaining favor within the courtroom of public opinion.” Justin’s group did not reply to a request for remark.

Quick ahead to yesterday, and Selection reported that Taylor would now not face a courtroom summons as Justin’s group had withdrawn the subpoena. As per the publication, each Blake and Taylor’s attorneys had filed motions to beforehand dismiss the summons, which “sought communications between their respective authorized groups.”

A spokesperson for Blake subsequently stated, “We’re happy that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Events have withdrawn their harassing subpoenas to Taylor Swift and her legislation agency…We supported the efforts of Taylor’s group to quash these inappropriate subpoenas directed to her counsel and we’ll proceed to face up for any third get together who’s unjustly harassed or threatened within the course of.”

“The Baldoni and Wayfarer group have tried to place Taylor Swift, a lady who has been an inspiration for tens of hundreds of thousands throughout the globe, on the middle of this case since day one,” they additional alleged. “Exploiting Taylor Swift’s celeb was the unique plan in Melissa Nathan’s situation planning doc, and it continues to at the present time. Confronted with having to justify themselves in federal courtroom, they folded. In some unspecified time in the future they are going to run out of distractions from the precise claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they’re going through.”

The “situation planning doc” refers back to the PR doc that Blake’s authorized grievance says was despatched to Justin, which deliberate for what would possibly occur “ought to [Ms. Lively] and her group make her grievances public.” The doc reportedly stated, that it might “additionally discover planting tales concerning the weaponization of feminism and the way individuals in BL’s circle like Taylor Swift, have been accused of using these ways to ‘bully’ into getting what they need.”

As of proper now, Justin’s group hasn’t issued an announcement. BuzzFeed has reached out to Bryan Freedman for remark.

You Might Also Like

Supply On Blake Energetic And Anna Kendrick Feud Rumors

Jenna Ortega Wore A Glass Costume That Has To Be Seen

Scooter Braun Provides Replace On Justin Bieber Relationship

How Many Iconic '90s Disney Films Can You Acknowledge From A Single Screenshot?

Fox Information Host Goes Viral For Awkward Spouse Remark

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article ‘Honey Do not!’ overview: Chris Evans, Margaret Qualley, and Aubrey Plaza get wild in lusty crime comedy ‘Honey Do not!’ overview: Chris Evans, Margaret Qualley, and Aubrey Plaza get wild in lusty crime comedy
Next Article Let’s Discuss About ChatGPT and Dishonest within the Classroom Let’s Discuss About ChatGPT and Dishonest within the Classroom
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

More News

Scaling agentic AI: Inside Atlassian’s tradition of experimentation
Scaling agentic AI: Inside Atlassian’s tradition of experimentation
25 minutes ago
JoJo Siwa’s TikTok Caption About Perfecting Tea Defended
JoJo Siwa’s TikTok Caption About Perfecting Tea Defended
49 minutes ago
Assist us report on jobs in northeast Wisconsin
Assist us report on jobs in northeast Wisconsin
1 hour ago
191 Prime Day Offers Picked By Folks Who Obsessively Check Gear
191 Prime Day Offers Picked By Folks Who Obsessively Check Gear
1 hour ago
Hershey CEO exit means Fortune 500 loses a feminine CEO
Hershey CEO exit means Fortune 500 loses a feminine CEO
2 hours ago

About Us

about us

PulseReporter connects with and influences 20 million readers globally, establishing us as the leading destination for cutting-edge insights in entertainment, lifestyle, money, tech, travel, and investigative journalism.

Categories

  • Entertainment
  • Investigations
  • Lifestyle
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Trending

  • Scaling agentic AI: Inside Atlassian’s tradition of experimentation
  • JoJo Siwa’s TikTok Caption About Perfecting Tea Defended
  • Assist us report on jobs in northeast Wisconsin

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
  • Disclaimer
2024 © Pulse Reporter. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account