In an trade that prides itself on disruption, dressing down grew to become its personal sort of dominance, whereas additionally reflecting the tech ideology of the time: Innovation over custom, effectivity over extra, and—not less than in its early days—a perception that know-how existed to serve individuals, not simply revenue from them.
Certainly, within the early 2000s and 2010s, tech’s largest names offered themselves as visionaries on a mission to democratize entry, enhance lives, and construct a greater future. The trade positioned itself as an antidote to Wall Avenue’s greed, and the seemingly informal uniform of T-shirts, hoodies, and sneakers strengthened that distinction. Tech leaders weren’t flashy bankers in tailor-made fits; they had been downside solvers, engineers, and idealists, working towards a utopian imaginative and prescient of progress.
“Zuckerberg’s type shift says one thing a couple of particular group of American billionaires who’re aligning themselves with what seems to be a brand new political order inside the US,” Wild says. “These moguls management multinationals, which embrace Meta, Google, Amazon and Uber, which have a rare capability to affect individuals’s decisionmaking, and who’re consequently prime figures for politicians to reasonable.” Whereas the Biden administration did this by way of the judicial arm of presidency and authorized courts, it seems President Trump appears inclined to deal with these males by way of his private court docket, the place they’re required to hunt his approval.
“We noticed this at Trump’s presidential inauguration,” says Wild, “the place the invitees constituted a who’s who of American tech billionaires. For me, there are robust parallels with medieval royal courts, the place members of the aristocracy competed amongst themselves, usually in what they wore and the way they consumed, for the eye and patronage of the ruler. Inside America immediately, these males appear much less involved about their notion among the many public, and much more involved about how they seem to at least one one other, and Trump.”
For now, some tech bros—Sam Altman included—are nonetheless clinging to their tees and motion slacks, however how lengthy earlier than their look evolves to match the rising energy they wield? OpenAI, in any case, appears to be getting darker by the day. After which there’s Sundar Pichai, the quiet architect of Google’s AI empire, whose style might not be making headlines (but) however whose insurance policies actually are. Below his watch, Alphabet simply scrapped its long-standing promise to not develop AI for weapons or surveillance.
So what’s subsequent? A titanium Richard Mille constructed for billionaires with protection contracts? A bespoke Brunello Cucinelli cashmere sweater emblazoned with “In AI We Belief”? Pichai has already ditched the New Steadiness memo for these Lanvin sneakers, with hype footwear a earlier gateway drug for billionaires. (Zuck famously has a penchant for Adidas 4DFWD x Strung trainers.) If the brand new tech costume code is all about signaling dominance, certainly it gained’t be lengthy earlier than Pichai and Altman observe swimsuit. As a result of in Silicon Valley, energy isn’t simply wielded—now it’s worn.
The Impunity of Reinvention
The curious factor? Few are questioning Mark Zuckerberg’s transformation. Most commentary fixates on the what and how—his sculpted physique, designer equipment, and combat-ready aesthetic—reasonably than the why. “This emphasizes the persistence of gender inequalities. When Kamala Harris was operating for workplace, her aesthetic selections had been scrutinised relentlessly. But Zuckerberg’s evolution is met with curiosity reasonably than critique. It highlights the impunity with which highly effective males can reinvent themselves,” says Wild.
For Zuckerberg, the shift from awkward tech nerd to combat-trained, bodily imposing chief mirrors the broader trajectory of Silicon Valley itself. The archetype of the hoodie-clad disruptor has been changed by one thing extra militarized, extra overtly aggressive. The brand new tech oligarchy isn’t nearly controlling notion; it’s about controlling complete industries—maybe even international locations. And more and more, it operates past the attain of conventional accountability.
