Studying Time: 3 minutes
The opposite day, in my function as an advocate for open authorities, I heard from a Wisconsin resident who has waited greater than 5 months for data he requested from an area regulation enforcement company. He has gently prodded the company a number of occasions, asking, “How rather more time is my request going to take?” Greater than three months have handed since these queries have yielded a response.
Such lengthy, irritating wait occasions should not unusual. Wisconsin’s Open Data Legislation permits any individual to acquire any doc within the possession of state and native authorities officers, with restricted exceptions. However, not like in another states, there isn’t a set time restrict. Reasonably, the regulation merely directs document custodians to behave “as quickly as practicable and directly.”
What does that imply? Good query.
The state Justice Division has stated that “10 working days is an affordable time for an authority to reply” to easy data requests. However this isn’t binding recommendation. Furthermore, no court docket has ever dominated {that a} specific wait time was extreme.
I inform individuals experiencing lengthy wait occasions to observe their “Ps”: Be well mannered. Be persistent. And be pragmatic — provide to make clear or refine your request to make it extra manageable. Typically, this helps transfer issues alongside. Different occasions, it appears to make no distinction.
That’s the place Tom Kamenick is available in. He’s the founder and president of the Wisconsin Transparency Mission, the state’s solely regulation agency devoted completely to open authorities litigation. Since 2019, Kamenick has filed seven lawsuits alleging unlawful delays within the processing of open data requests. He has misplaced just one case — during which the data have been supplied however had ended up within the requester’s spam folder.
His different six circumstances led to settlements favorable to the requestors: Data have been supplied, authorized prices have been coated and, in a minimum of one case, the custodian apologized. The issue is that these settlement wins don’t set a authorized precedent that may be cited by others, though they do add credibility to threats of authorized motion.
Final 12 months, Kamenick sued the Madison Police Division on my behalf after it advised me to anticipate a wait time of 14 months to acquire data associated to police self-discipline. The workplace employed extra workers and licensed time beyond regulation to cut back its backlog. Final month, Kamenick sued the Racine County Sheriff’s Division on behalf of an area resident, Mitchell Berman, over its lengthy delays in producing data together with video footage. “Delays like this are all too widespread,” Kamenick famous in an announcement.
Custodians usually contend they lack the workers and sources to deal with requests extra promptly. Kamenick’s response is to say it isn’t a query of sources however priorities. One college district he sued had a $600 million price range and assigned a single workers place dedicated to data requests, then allowed that place to go unfilled.
Certainly, the data regulation expressly states that dealing with data requests “is said to be a necessary operate of a consultant authorities and an integral a part of the routine duties of officers and staff whose duty it’s to offer such info.” Meaning it ought to be extra of a precedence.
Ultimately the courts ought to weigh in on this, in a precedent-setting case. The issue additionally cries out for a legislative resolution. A revised regulation might nonetheless say “as quickly as practicable and directly,” but in addition set a time restrict of, say, 30 days, for data to be supplied, absent extraordinary circumstances. Maybe the state might present extra funding or steerage to assist make this doable — definitely there are worse methods it might spend its $4.6 billion price range surplus.
There may be an outdated saying that justice delayed is justice denied; the identical is true for data requests. For those who don’t get the data till you’ll be able to hardly bear in mind what you wished them for, the regulation will not be working as supposed.
Your Proper to Know is a month-to-month column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Info Council (wisfoic.org), a bunch devoted to open authorities. Invoice Lueders, a author in Madison and editor-at-large of The Progressive, is the group’s president.
Republish our articles free of charge, on-line or in print, beneath a Inventive Commons license.
