The top of the company that compiles the intently watched month-to-month jobs report normally toils in obscurity, however on Friday, the present holder of that job was loudly fired by the president of america.
Erika McEntarfer, a longtime authorities worker, bore the brunt of President Donald Trump’s unhappiness with Friday’s jobs report, which confirmed that hiring had slowed in July and was a lot much less in Might and June that beforehand estimated. He accused her with out proof of manipulating the job numbers and famous she was an appointee of President Joe Biden.
McEntarfer, a longtime authorities employee who had served as BLS head for a 12 months and a half, didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark by The Related Press. However her predecessor overseeing the roles company, former co-workers and associates have denounced the firing, warning about its repercussions and saying McEntarfer was nonpolitical in her function.
Right here’s what to learn about Erika McEntarfer:
McEntarfer has a robust background on economics
McEntarfer, whose analysis focuses on job loss, retirement, employee mobility, and wage rigidity, had beforehand labored on the Census Bureau’s Heart for Financial Research, the Treasury Division’s Workplace of Tax Coverage and the White Home Council of Financial Advisers in a nonpolitical function.
She has a bachelor’s diploma in Social Science from Bard School and a doctoral diploma in economics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State College.
She was confirmed as BLS head on a bipartisan vote
McEntarfer was nominated in 2023 to function BLS head, and the Senate Committee on Well being, Training, Labor and Pensions beneficial that her nomination go to the total Senate for a vote.
She was confirmed as BLS commissioner in January 2024 on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote. Among the many Republican senators who voted to verify her included then-Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, who’s now Trump’s vp, and then-Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who’s now Trump’s secretary of state.
Earlier than her affirmation listening to, a gaggle referred to as the Mates of the BLS, made up of former commissioners who served in each Democratic and Republican administrations, members of statistical associations and credentialed economists, mentioned McEntarfer’s background made her an amazing alternative for the job.
“The numerous causes to rapidly verify Dr. McEntarfer as the brand new BLS Commissioner all boil all the way down to this: the company, like the whole statistical system, is present process an intense, important interval of change and Dr. McEntarfer’s wealth of analysis and statistical expertise have geared up her to be the sturdy chief that BLS wants to fulfill these challenges,” Mates of the BLS wrote.
Her former associates and associates decry her firing
William Seaside, who was appointed BLS commissioner in 2019 by Trump and served till 2023 throughout President Joe Biden’s administration, referred to as McEntarfer’s firing “groundless” and mentioned in an X publish that it “units a harmful precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.”
Former Labor Division chief economist Sarah J. Glynn, who obtained common briefings from McEntarfer about BLS findings, mentioned McEntarfer was beneficiant together with her time explaining what conclusions might or couldn’t be reached from the information.
If the information didn’t help one thing an administration official was saying, McEntarfer would say so, Glynn mentioned. She additionally by no means weighed in on how the administration ought to current or interpret the information, Glynn mentioned — she would merely reply questions in regards to the information.
“She had a sterling popularity as somebody who is worried in regards to the accuracy of the information and never somebody who places a political spin on her work,” Glynn mentioned.
Heather Boushey, a senior analysis fellow at Harvard College, served with McEntarfer on the White Home Council of Financial Advisers and mentioned McEntarfer by no means talked politics at work.
“She confirmed up each day to concentrate on the perfect evaluation and the perfect strategy to her discipline and never get political. That’s what I noticed from her repeatedly. She is good and well-respected amongst labor economists typically,” Boushey mentioned. “She wasn’t coming into my workplace to speak politics or the political implications of one thing. She positively wasn’t participating on that facet of issues.”
