A federal watchdog this month advised the Environmental Safety Company that its regulatory oversight of Seresto flea-and-tick collars, which have been linked to greater than 2,000 pet deaths, was not “ample.”
Federal scrutiny of the Seresto collars began in 2021, after Examine Midwest and USA TODAY revealed the collar was linked to tens of hundreds of incidents of hurt, together with rashes on people. The EPA in the end allowed Seresto to proceed to be offered, however the company ordered a warning label to be added to the product.
Nonetheless, in February, the EPA’s Workplace of Inspector Normal advised the EPA it wanted to find out whether or not “Seresto pet collars pose an unreasonable threat to pet well being.” Regardless of its evaluation, the EPA has “not offered assurance” the collar is secure, the inspector normal concluded.
To perform that purpose, the inspector normal advisable the company re-open the evaluation course of for the 2 energetic substances in Seresto — primarily, this could decide whether or not the pesticides have been secure sufficient to be offered within the U.S. This could additionally permit for public touch upon the collars.
The EPA has declined to comply with the watchdog’s advice. Whereas the evaluation course of is the usual method a pesticide makes it to market, the EPA has different mechanisms to deal with issues with merchandise, the company advised the inspector normal’s workplace in response to its February report.
For example, in 2023, the company launched the outcomes of an inquiry into the collar. The EPA in the end determined the collar might keep in the marketplace, with extra reporting necessities for Seresto’s maker. The company mentioned this inquiry glad the advice’s intent.
On Aug. 7, the watchdog revealed its response.
“General, the company’s response doesn’t adequately tackle” the way it will regulate the Seresto collars, in keeping with the inspector normal’s workplace. Particularly, not opening Seresto up for public remark is a “deficiency” that’s “inconsistent” with the EPA’s customary practices, it added.
In a press release to Examine Midwest on Friday, the EPA reiterated that the brand new necessities positioned on Seresto’s maker, Elanco Animal Well being, have been sufficient to maintain pets secure.
“Primarily based on this evaluation and with a view to proceed the registration, Elanco carried out a number of new labeling and reporting necessities to enhance the protection of this product,” the EPA mentioned. “The purpose of those mitigations is to proceed to permit merchandise in the marketplace that may defend pets whereas minimizing threat related to using Seresto collars.”
Elanco didn’t return a request for remark. The corporate has maintained the collar is secure, and it disputed that incidents of hurt reported to the EPA equaled proof of hazard. Bayer, the German conglomerate, offered its complete animal well being unit, which initially produced Seresto collars, to Elanco in 2020 for $7.6 billion.
“Elanco unequivocally continues to face behind the protection profile of Seresto as a confirmed resolution to assist defend canine and cats from fleas and ticks,” an Elanco spokesperson advised Examine Midwest in 2022. “We assist all company evaluation processes.”
Internally, the EPA recognized incidents associated to Seresto collars as a trigger for concern years in the past. In 2015, company officers mentioned Seresto’s incident counts “ranked #1 by a large margin” in comparison with different flea-and-tick collars, Examine Midwest and USA TODAY reported.
Regardless of that, the company didn’t evaluation the collar till the variety of incidents was reported broadly within the press in 2021. As soon as the story was out, an EPA biologist emailed a colleague, “Seems just like the sh** has hit the fan. … We now have been screaming about (Seresto) for a few years.”
Inspector normal’s findings
The inspector normal began its probe into the EPA’s dealing with of Seresto collars in Could 2022. In February of this 12 months, it launched its findings.
These embrace:
When the EPA performed its registration evaluation of Seresto’s energetic substances, it didn’t assess whether or not the pesticides posed a threat to pets. The company initially dedicated to do that, nevertheless it in the end didn’t, in keeping with the inspector normal’s report. The energetic substances are flumethrin and imidacloprid.
The company advised the inspector normal’s workplace it doesn’t have the “experience and sources” to evaluate the toxicity to animals. It additionally has no requirements to evaluate the chance to pets, it mentioned.
The EPA mentioned its scientific evaluation, launched in 2023, was the “equal” of assessing the dangers posed to pets.
The protocol the EPA relied on when it initially accepted the substances within the Seresto collar isn’t “as much as worldwide requirements.” The protocol the EPA follows is from 1998, regardless of different nations following more moderen pointers.
“Workers we interviewed indicated this was not a precedence,” the inspector normal’s workplace wrote. One longtime EPA scientist known as utilizing the 1998 protocol “a ‘obtrusive weak spot’ that has develop into publicly apparent with the Seresto pet collar incidents.”
The information the EPA collects on incidents associated to pesticide publicity is “insufficient to find out unreasonable hostile results.” For example, it doesn’t seize any narrative info on incidents that will assist the company assess a pesticide’s toxicity.
EPA employees advised the inspector normal’s workplace the incident information is “unreliable … there may be underreporting, and information high quality is suspect.”
The EPA has already requested Elanco to supply extra info than different firms associated to incidents involving Seresto. This contains “essential particulars on loss of life incidents, ample case comply with up on any reported deaths, and knowledge on a pet’s well being standing” earlier than it wore the collar, the EPA mentioned.
The EPA lacks a normal working process for reviewing the dangers to pets, and it was unclear to the inspector normal’s workplace the place the duty for reviewing dangers to pets resides. One company official mentioned a scarcity of veterinary experience possible contributes to the problem.
Seresto timeline
In early 2021, Examine Midwest and USA TODAY revealed that the Seresto flea-and-tick collars have been linked to tens of hundreds of incidents of hurt, together with virtually 1,700 pet deaths over a number of years. However the product carried no warning.
A month later, the EPA introduced it was reviewing the collar. Because the evaluation occurred, the Home Subcommittee on Financial and Shopper Coverage launched its personal investigation. On the time, the subcommittee was a part of the Home Oversight Committee, the primary investigative physique of the U.S. Home of Representatives, and was chaired by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Illinois. (The subcommittee not exists.)
In summer season 2022, shortly after the EPA’s inspector normal introduced its probe, the Home subcommittee launched the findings of its investigation. It discovered different nations require Seresto to come back with a warning label, and that Canada banned the collar after authorities there discovered a excessive fee of incidents of hurt. The subcommittee known as on the EPA to ban Seresto.
A few 12 months later, in July 2023, the EPA introduced it had accomplished its inquiry of the Seresto collar. It might nonetheless be offered, however the EPA positioned mitigation measures in place. Elanco was required so as to add a warning label, and it was solely granted a 5-year registration. Usually, pesticides are accepted for 15 years earlier than producers want to use for his or her continued use.
Republish our articles at no cost, on-line or in print.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25803928/2180591145.jpg?w=150&resize=150,150&ssl=1 "The FTC orders Marriott and Starwood to beef up their information safety")
