The Tesla board has reinstated Elon Musk because the highest-paid CEO in historical past with a staggering new $29 billion pay package deal. His new take care of the $970 billion electric-vehicle maker comes after a Delaware decide twice rescinded Musk’s earlier moonshot mega-grant. Musk’s pay has been held up in litigation for the previous seven years.
“It’s crucial to retain and inspire our extraordinary expertise, starting with Elon,” Tesla board chair Robyn Denholm and fellow director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson wrote in a letter to shareholders. “The conflict for AI expertise is intensifying, with latest months together with multibillion-dollar acquisitions of firms and nine-figure money compensation packages for non-founder, particular person AI engineers.”
Even in that choose group, “nobody matches” Musk, the board members wrote. Thus, the almost $30 billion award is important to conserving Musk centered on Tesla—and getting him to recruit new expertise to maintain the EV producer aggressive in AI, robotics, and robotaxis, in accordance with the board. Not like Musk’s earlier pay plan, which included important shareholder worth hurdles he needed to overcome, all Musk has to do to gather the brand new award is stay with Tesla as CEO or in a senior government position for the subsequent two years. He additionally has to carry the inventory till 2030, in accordance with the phrases of the award, which is able to enhance his possession stake from round 13% to fifteen%.
Brian Dunn, a 40-year compensation practitioner and director of the Institute for Compensation Research at Cornell College, advised Fortune Musk’s new award resembles what some specialists have known as “fog-the-mirror grants.”
“In case you’re round and have sufficient breath left in you to fog the mirror, you get them,” stated Dunn. “These don’t have efficiency targets.”
Technically, the award will probably be made in restricted shares, however Musk has to pay $23.34 per share to personal the inventory—the identical strike value as his 2018 choices. With Tesla’s inventory buying and selling at greater than $300 a share, the association offers Musk about $280 per share of built-in worth, which some comp specialists have known as “discounted choices.”
Larry Cunningham, director of the College of Delaware’s Weinberg Middle for Company Governance, stated that no matter how the award could possibly be categorized for accounting or tax functions, there’s a easy and correct description for it.
“A deep-in-the-money inventory choice grant, awarded solely for retention,” Cunningham advised Fortune in a press release.
Musk’s pay package deal has a $26 billion ground
The brand new package deal creates what Farient Advisors’ Eric Hoffmann described as a “floor-and-ceiling” association tied on to the end result of the continued litigation in Delaware, which Tesla has appealed. If courts once more wipe out his unique 2018 award of 303 million inventory choices, Musk will get to maintain the brand new 96 million shares, price about $29 billion on the present inventory value. But when any a part of the unique grant will get reinstated, the brand new award will shrink accordingly, stated Hoffmann.
“There’s a clause that claims ‘no double dipping,’” he stated. “However this 96 million share award could possibly be used to make up any of the unique grant if he loses in the middle of the authorized motion.”
Hoffmann stated the territory the Tesla board is treading is “unprecedented” in government compensation.
“There’s no playbook for this,” stated Hoffmann, who analyzed the phrases of the award. “They made the primary grant, it received overturned by a decide; they made one other grant, received it authorized by shareholders, after which that received held up.”
To stage set, a shareholder problem over Musk’s 2018 pay package deal led to a landmark opinion through which Musk’s pay was rescinded. The Tesla board then despatched the pay plan again to shareholders in 2024 for a say-on-pay vote approval, and shareholders voted in favor of giving Musk the comp. Final December, the identical decide—Delaware Courtroom Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick—declined to reverse her earlier choice, which Tesla has since appealed.
In its letter to buyers, the board wrote there’s no telling when the court docket will rule once more and described this award as a “first step, ‘good religion’ fee to Elon.”
Nonetheless, Tesla’s efficiency in 2025 is a far cry from 2018, when the board first awarded Musk his daring moonshot grant. He adopted the award up by multiplying Tesla’s worth 12-fold. Its market cap surpassed $1 trillion in October 2021 and once more in Could 2025. However lately Tesla has struggled. 12 months thus far, its share value is down greater than 18%, and Musk has been lively politically, supporting President Donald Trump regardless of the affiliation turning off Tesla’s climate-focused shopper base, significantly in California.
And this time, the board has left little to likelihood. Tesla erected a major authorized barrier in Could that makes a problem to this award much more tough to mete out.
After McCormick’s ruling, Tesla shareholders authorized a transfer from being integrated in Delaware to Texas. In Could, Texas amended its enterprise code, and Tesla modified its bylaws accordingly a day later. The bylaw modification created a brand new threshold so any shareholder who desires to problem Musk’s pay in court docket has to carry at the very least 3% of Tesla’s inventory. The worth is price greater than $3 billion.
“The central theme right here is that Tesla has moved its jurisdiction of incorporation from Delaware to Texas, and because of this the propriety of Tesla’s actions and Musk’s compensation must be judged beneath Texas regulation, which is extra permissive,” wrote Columbia regulation professor John Espresso in a press release to Fortune. “Tesla might get sued, however the odds are extra in its favor in Texas.”
Texas adopted Tesla’s transfer by enterprise a marketing campaign to make it a business-first state. At this level, it’s unclear how Texas courts would method a problem.
“Will probably be fascinating to see whether or not a Texas court docket chooses to observe Delaware’s analytical framework—or as an alternative declines to have interaction in comparable judicial scrutiny,” stated Cunningham. “The end result may affect how different firms weigh the relative deserves of Delaware versus Texas as a company residence.”
Buyers react to Musk’s comp
Tesla has a veritable military of engaged particular person retail buyers, and plenty of help Musk and have voted in favor of his comp plan twice now, getting it over the road with greater than majority help.
Nonetheless, some pension fund leaders who oversee retiree belongings invested in Tesla inventory have been lower than thrilled about Musk’s new award.
“A $29 billion compensation package deal for any CEO, not to mention one who has been largely absent from their each day duties as gross sales and inventory worth proceed to fall wanting investor expectations, is obscene,” stated New York Metropolis Comptroller Brad Lander in a press release.
Lander stated Tesla’s board is enriching Musk at buyers’ expense, “as soon as once more.”
Illinois State Treasurer Michael Frerichs advised Fortune a $29 billion comp package deal is “egregious on its face.”
“However in mild of Elon Musk’s inattention to the day-to-day wants of Tesla, and the corporate’s worse than anticipated inventory worth, the package deal suggests a board out of step with their duties to buyers,” Frerichs wrote in a press release. “With revenues falling wanting expectations, the board needs to be much less involved with paying fealty to a grasping CEO than with long-term planning for the success of the corporate. Shareholders ought to demand higher company governance.”
SOC Funding Group, which represented a bunch of buyers with almost 8 million shares invested in Tesla, advised Fortune in a press release that immediately’s announcement included a putting admission from the board. “Even a further $24B in fairness won’t inspire Elon Musk to remain for 2 extra years, not to mention be certain that he commit adequate time and a spotlight to show across the at the moment slumping gross sales,” SOC wrote.
