What’s price for disenfranchising Madison voters?

Studying Time: 5 minutes

Election officers in Madison are already going through a state and metropolis investigation into the sequence of errors that resulted in practically 200 absentee ballots not being counted in final fall’s election. Now officers there face a declare for compensation in an uncommon case that goals to emphasise the significance of correctly counting all ballots and set a financial penalty for denying individuals their vote. 

A liberal election regulation group referred to as Legislation Ahead served a $34 million declare this month in opposition to Madison and Dane County, in search of damages amounting to $175,000 for every Madison voter whose absentee poll bought misplaced. The submitting is probably going a precursor to a lawsuit, because the group is in search of out different disenfranchised voters to affix its case.

“There may be going to be a value to pay if you intrude with somebody’s proper to vote in Wisconsin,” mentioned Scott Thompson, workers counsel for Legislation Ahead.

Instances like this have a historical past that goes again to the voting rights fights of the late 1800s and 1900s, when officers deliberately sought to bar Black individuals from voting. However they’re extremely uncommon right now — most voting rights circumstances search solely to have a challenged proper restored, fairly than damages — and specialists say it’s unlikely that Legislation Ahead’s declare within the Madison case will result in any damages being paid out.

The specter of a monetary price for errors might add to the stress on native clerk’s places of work, which already take care of the challenges of latest legal guidelines and court docket rulings, together with persistent scrutiny from election skeptics and lawmakers. (Madison’s metropolis clerk has been positioned on go away whereas the investigation into her workplace continues.) Some clerks across the state mentioned they think about the errors in Madison critical, however questioned the transfer to assign legal responsibility.

Melissa Kono, the clerk within the small city of Burnside in western Wisconsin, mentioned that as an alternative of a payout to voters affected by an error, cash could be higher spent on creating a greater system for clerks to handle the rising variety of absentee ballots, which have surged because the COVID-19 pandemic. The uncounted ballots in Madison had been all absentee ballots.

Thompson acknowledged the potential influence of his group’s motion on clerks. However he mentioned it serves as a broader response to the regular stream of lawsuits filed by conservative teams since 2020 aimed toward stopping officers from counting sure ballots due to the way in which they’re returned or the data they’re lacking. Within the context of those lawsuits, he mentioned, it’s necessary to ship a message that there needs to be a value for disenfranchising individuals.

“Elections are about exercising the precise to vote,” he mentioned. “They’re not about discovering methods to kick individuals off the voter rolls.” 

Authorized submitting says Madison and Dane County violated structure

In a press release, Madison spokesperson Dylan Brogan didn’t instantly handle the Legislation Ahead declare however mentioned each poll needs to be counted precisely and that town is cooperating with ongoing investigations whereas conducting its personal. 

Right here’s what investigators have mentioned concerning the case up to now: In all, 193 absentee ballots that had been despatched to 2 polling locations within the metropolis for tabulation on Election Day went lacking, and weren’t counted, even after they had been discovered. For causes nonetheless unknown, the election employees at these polling locations by no means opened the courier baggage containing these ballots. These ballots then went to town clerk’s workplace, however employees didn’t open one of many parcels till Nov. 12 and the opposite one till Dec. 3. 

The ballots within the bag opened on Nov. 12 might nonetheless have been counted — metropolis and county officers have given conflicting accounts on why they weren’t.

The sum complete of the oversights, Legislation Ahead alleges in its declare, resulted within the unconstitutional disenfranchisement of the 193 voters. The group seems to be making ready for a class-action lawsuit and is welcoming the opposite disenfranchised voters to affix the case. 

Within the declare, the group cites two Wisconsin Supreme Court docket circumstances that it says enable it to sue for damages, even when what occurred in Madison seems to be a sequence of unintentional oversights. 

A kind of circumstances was a judgment from 1866, by which the court docket dominated that authorities officers will be discovered liable for his or her actions in denying Black Wisconsin residents the precise to vote, even when these actions are executed with out malice. The opposite is a 1916 discovering that as a result of a bunch of voters was entitled to vote, individuals depriving them of that proper will be held liable for his or her disenfranchisement.

Claims like these sometimes transfer to lawsuits in the event that they’re not resolved, and town and county are unlikely to simply accept or negotiate the requested quantity, seemingly prompting Legislation Ahead to file swimsuit this summer time.

When voters search financial damages 

Why ask for cash on behalf of the voters? Thompson mentioned it’s as a result of there’s nothing else to ask for in addition to cash and a discovering of town’s wrongdoing. It was too late, he mentioned, to offer the voters again the precise they’d been disadvantaged of: the precise to vote and have their ballots counted within the November 2024 election.

Thompson mentioned attorney-client privilege prevented him from disclosing how the group arrived on the $175,000 determine for every voter. Wisconsin regulation presently caps damages in opposition to authorities officers at $50,000. Thompson mentioned a secondary objective of the forthcoming lawsuit is to have a court docket discover that regulation unconstitutional and permit teams to hunt bigger damages. 

Voter lawsuits in search of financial damages had been by no means quite common, however there have been situations within the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, sometimes tied to racial discrimination, mentioned Justin Levitt, an election regulation professor at Loyola Marymount College and a former deputy assistant lawyer basic within the Justice Division’s civil rights division. 

Probably the most distinguished circumstances of this type had been in Texas, the place between the Twenties and Nineteen Forties Black voters who had been barred from voting in Democratic primaries due to their race typically sued for damages in court docket, Levitt mentioned.

In these circumstances, Black voters had been designed to be omitted of the voting course of. In Madison, against this, it seems at this level {that a} sequence of errors — not malice or intent — led to those ballots getting misplaced initially.

However Thompson cautioned in opposition to coming to conclusions about why the Madison ballots didn’t finally get counted.

“It’s too early for anybody, I believe, to say with certainty precisely what occurred and why it occurred right here,” he mentioned. 

Lawsuits in search of damages in opposition to authorities officers face two important challenges, mentioned Richard Hasen, director of the Safeguarding Democracy Undertaking at UCLA College of Legislation: First, courts often search for one thing extra egregious than negligence, similar to malicious intent. Second, he mentioned, quite a lot of authorized doctrines often give authorities officers a raised degree of immunity. 

He mentioned he couldn’t consider any circumstances of this type, the place voters disadvantaged of their proper to vote efficiently sued election officers for damages, because the Nineteen Sixties.

Clerks query financial penalty for errors

If town accepts the declare or a court docket does award damages, it might have a monetary influence of thousands and thousands of {dollars} and would ship a sign throughout the state.

“It’s not regular for this amount of ballots to go uncounted, and I believe everyone acknowledges that that’s not regular,” Levitt mentioned. “If this case succeeded, it might considerably enhance the stakes of an error like that.”

However Madison’s errors stand out as unusually critical, mentioned Wooden County Clerk Trent Miner, a Republican. He mentioned he thinks that Legislation Ahead’s declare proposes too excessive a penalty, however that it shouldn’t make clerks concern the prospect of penalties for the far much less consequential errors that they encounter every now and then.

“People run elections, so errors will occur,” he mentioned. “This, I believe, pole vaults over a minor error.”

Kono, the Burnside clerk, identified that the preliminary error of not counting the ballots on the polling websites was by the hands of the ballot employees on the Madison polling websites who by no means opened or processed the 193 ballots.

“For those who’re counting on unpaid or low-paid, glorified volunteers, basically, what’s the legal responsibility?” she mentioned.

Even when the court docket doesn’t finally award financial damages, the invention part of the anticipated lawsuit — the place the 2 sides should share proof — might considerably enhance transparency round Madison’s ballot-counting errors, Thompson mentioned. This course of would seemingly place extra stress on Madison and Dane County to completely disclose data past what has already emerged from ongoing metropolis and state investigations.

Alexander Shur is a reporter for Votebeat primarily based in Wisconsin. Contact Shur at ashur@votebeat.org.

Votebeat is a nonprofit information group reporting on voting entry and election administration throughout the U.S. Join Votebeat Wisconsin’s free e-newsletter right here.