Wisconsin Nationwide Guard firing: Governor declines additional overview

Studying Time: 7 minutes

For Col. Leslie Zyzda Martin — who was fired from the Wisconsin Nationwide Guard regardless of 4 investigations failing to substantiate allegations towards her — the language in Wisconsin’s navy justice regulation is evident: Any members of the Nationwide Guard who assume they’ve been wronged by a commander could make a grievance that should be reviewed and resolved as quickly as potential by a superior officer. 

But greater than a yr after making such a grievance, Zyzda Martin says she continues to be ready for some type of justice. The commander whom she has accused of unceremoniously firing her, Brig. Gen. David Could, continues to be interim head of the Wisconsin Nationwide Guard and could also be retiring quickly. And his boss, Gov. Tony Evers, knowledgeable Zyzda Martin in August he’s declining additional overview, however didn’t present information of any proceedings associated to the actual overview she requested.

Navy authorized consultants who reviewed the supply in Article 138 of Wisconsin’s navy justice code agreed it compels the Guard and the governor, as commander-in-chief, to overview such complaints, particularly as a result of the grievance includes an adjutant common. Whoever opinions the grievance should additionally present documentation of the proceedings of that overview. 

A lawyer who advises the Legislature agreed the regulation permits Zyzda Martin to enchantment to the governor, however doesn’t seem to offer recourse if the governor declines to behave.

Guard spokesperson Bridget Esser emphasised the state Division of Workforce Improvement Equal Rights Division decided in 2023 that the Guard didn’t discriminate towards Zyzda Martin. That discovering responded to a intercourse discrimination grievance Zyzda Martin filed in June 2022. She withdrew her enchantment in January 2024, however continued to pursue the Article 138 grievance.

The Guard stated whereas 4 investigations didn’t substantiate three complaints towards Zyzda Martin, info gleaned from these investigations brought on Could to lose confidence in her potential to command. The Guard didn’t present an in depth clarification for her firing when Wisconsin Watch requested, saying it was defending Zyzda Martin’s privateness even after she signed a waiver for the Guard to launch her personnel information to the information outlet.

Evers spokesperson Britt Cudaback stated the Guard “has supplied reliable, non-discriminatory causes” for demoting and firing Zyzda Martin.

“To ensure that a fallacious to be remedied a fallacious should be recognized,” Cudaback stated. “Primarily based on a overview of Zyzda Martin’s grievance, supporting paperwork, and investigatory information of the three inspector common complaints made towards her, there is no such thing as a indication of any wrongful motion towards her.”

After her firing in November 2021, Zyzda Martin labored for the South Carolina Guard, however the disciplinary letters Could put in her navy report from her time in Wisconsin prevented her from being promoted. Due to that, she retired in October, ending her 34-year navy profession.

“I nonetheless don’t know what I did fallacious,” Zyzda Martin stated. “I do not know.”

Authorized avenue for recourse

Final yr, a Wisconsin Watch investigation highlighted Zyzda Martin’s case. It was notable as a result of the Wisconsin Nationwide Guard has been plagued for years by allegations of sexual harassment and a tradition that hasn’t supported ladies in uniform. Earlier reporting on these allegations led to Evers firing former Adjutant Basic Donald Dunbar, however commanders who served below him, together with Could, have remained.

Zyzda Martin suspects her termination pertains to how she dealt with a sexting case at Volk Area and different adjustments she made there, together with updates to the airfield’s security program after a technician died whereas altering mild bulbs on a runway. An impartial investigation into the dying later discovered that Volk Area, on the time below Could’s command, was not correctly staffed and had “vital voids in security program administration, coaching, and compliance.”

Due to the broad discretion navy commanders have, retribution might be swift for individuals who report wrongdoing. Service members have few avenues for recourse, however Wisconsin gives one authorized treatment: the Article 138 grievance. 

The regulation entitles “any member of the state navy forces” who believes they’ve been wronged by a commanding officer and is refused redress to “complain to any superior commissioned officer, who shall ahead the grievance to the officer exercising common court-martial jurisdiction over the officer towards whom it’s made.”

In response to the statute, which mirrors the one within the federal Uniform Code of Navy Justice, the superior officer “shall study the grievance and take correct measures for redressing the fallacious complained of; and shall, as quickly as potential, ship to the adjutant common a real assertion of that grievance, with the proceedings.”

Zyzda Martin filed an Article 138 grievance over her firing with Evers’ workplace in November 2023. She argues Evers is the correct particular person to overview the grievance as a result of, as commander-in-chief of the Guard, he oversees Could. Zyzda Martin additionally already sought redress with Could and Maj. Gen. Paul Knapp, making Evers subsequent within the chain of command.

In January 2024 Evers’ chief authorized counsel Mel Barnes stated Evers was deferring a call on whether or not to look into Zyzda Martin’s case to “permit for the completion of an inquiry by the Governor’s Workplace,” in accordance with a letter Barnes despatched to Zyzda Martin.

Eight months later, Evers’ workplace despatched a letter saying it reviewed the report of her elimination and was “declining to take additional motion on the grievance.”

However the workplace has produced no report of any correspondence or proceedings associated to both an Article 138 overview or the inquiry the governor’s workplace stated it was endeavor.

The Guard confirmed there have been no information of any proceedings associated to any opinions or inquiries in a November e-mail to Zyzda Martin. The Guard and Evers didn’t reply to Wisconsin Watch’s requests for information of any proceedings.

“If there was that inquiry, I ought to have paperwork exhibiting that,” Zyzda Martin stated. “The governor has the duty, regulation or not, to do the best factor and look into it.”

A proper to a significant investigation

Although navy authorized consultants stated Wisconsin’s navy justice code requires the Guard and the governor to overview Article 138 complaints, there are not any specifics within the statute of what the proceedings should appear to be.

“I don’t assume that the ensuing reporting must be a seven-volume magnum opus,” stated Eugene Fidell, who teaches navy justice at Yale Legislation College and co-founded the Nationwide Institute of Navy Justice. “However I believe there must be an effort to use the thoughts and discover the info and clarify what, if something, the governor goes to do.”

Typically Article 138 complaints go nowhere, however they’re a needed step if a service member plans to take a case to court docket, Fidell stated.

“The complaining get together has a proper to an up-or-down vote on a grievance and there must be a significant investigation and there must be a report generated,” Fidell stated.

However Wisconsin’s regulation doesn’t present steerage on how such a overview needs to be carried out, a key departure from how such complaints are dealt with on the federal stage, stated retired U.S. Marine Corps Lt. Col. Chip Hodge, a navy legal professional, who now represents service members globally in authorized instances.

“Often the providers present procedural steerage and on implementing the regulation,” he stated. 

“I haven’t seen that in Wisconsin … which results in that ambiguity. It looks as if they might be profiting from the paradox.”

Lt. Col. Ryan Sweazey, a retired F-16 pilot and former inspector common within the U.S. Air Drive who has labored with Zyzda Martin on her grievance, suspects that’s the case. 

“The governor’s workplace stated, ‘We’re not taking additional motion, you lose,’ basically, which is a violation of the Wisconsin state statute,” stated Sweazey, who based the Stroll The Discuss Basis, an advocacy group serving to service members navigate the navy judicial system. “The regulation is sweet but when there is no such thing as a accountability for violating the regulation or circumventing it, what’s the level?”

However David Moore, an legal professional with Wisconsin’s Legislative Council, a nonpartisan company of the Wisconsin Legislature, stated the regulation will not be clear on what it compels the governor to do.

“It’s not clear to me that Article 138 envisions a course of for submitting a grievance with the governor, however even when it does, that tees up that difficult query of ‘you possibly can take it to the governor, however does he actually must do something?’” Moore stated. “And if he doesn’t do something, is there any recourse to that?”

Though Evers is commander-in-chief of the Guard, Moore stated that doesn’t make him an officer within the context of the Article 138 statute. Additionally no court docket has clarified precisely what the regulation means.

Allegations not substantiated

The investigations towards Zyzda Martin have been the results of complaints made by the Air Drive’s Workplace of Inspector Basic. In a single case, even after the preliminary complainant voluntarily withdrew the grievance, Could pushed for an investigation to proceed, however the allegation nonetheless wasn’t substantiated.

In the long run, Could issued two letters of admonishment to Zyzda Martin on Nov. 8, 2021, the day she was fired. Could and Knapp used info from the investigations as the idea for self-discipline.

This “successfully railroad(ed) her honorable profession,” Zyzda Martin’s legal professional Toni O’Neill wrote in her Article 138 grievance.

One letter stated that though one investigation into Zyzda Martin’s work was unsubstantiated, 13 of 26 Guard members interviewed “famous some stage of regarding conduct or adverse connotations” about her strategy. However Zyzda Martin says she was by no means informed about any complaints and had little direct interplay with workers at Volk Area as a result of everybody labored individually throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

The letter additionally stated there was proof in a single investigation of an unhealthy command local weather, however Zyzda Martin famous the Guard by no means opened a separate inquiry into these allegations as required by navy regulation.

Could and Knapp fired her earlier than their third investigation into her conduct was full. That violates navy steerage on such investigations, which directs commanders to defer self-discipline till an investigation is completed.

Zyzda Martin stated Could informed her years in the past he deliberate to retire in March 2025. One other supply granted anonymity to share inside Guard info confirmed that’s nonetheless the case and that Could didn’t apply to change into the everlasting adjutant common.

Zyzda Martin now works for a protection consulting agency and stated she is contemplating her subsequent transfer to clear her identify.

“If that is how the leaders of our protection deal with their subordinates, are you able to think about what is occurring to the construction of our protection division?” Zyzda Martin stated. “If governors are going to be in control of the navy they must be held accountable and observe their procedures.”

Wisconsin Watch is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom. Subscribe to our newsletters for authentic tales and our Friday information roundup.